E.g., 06-23-2019

Friday, March 29, 2019

All day
Before 01 am
01 am
02 am
03 am
04 am
05 am
06 am
07 am
08 am
09 am
10 am
11 am
12 pm
01 pm
02 pm
03 pm
04 pm
05 pm
06 pm
07 pm
08 pm
09 pm
10 pm
11 pm
Are Intimate Partner Violence Risk Assessments Racially Biased?
Provided by: Battered Women’s Justice Project

Date: Friday, March 29, 2019
Time: 6:00 am – 7:30 am ChST

Content: In this webinar, we explore the question of whether Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) risk assessments (RAs) are racially biased. We situate IPV RAs within the broader movement to assess risk, links to bail reform and changes in pretrial detention, and research examining claims of racial bias in RAs. We then review some of the case law regarding acceptable use of RAs at various points in the legal process. We next turn to the development of IPV RAs in the field of violence against women. We discuss how these tools work and some of the pros and cons of using them. Our discussion leads us to ask whether IPV RAs might be racially biased against the accused, the alleged victim, or both parties. Importantly, the extant research does not answer the extraordinarily complex question of whether IPV RAs are racially biased. We therefore stress the need to consider the implications of using IPV RAs in the broader movement to confront IPV, particularly noting their limitations and tendency to mask bigger questions.  
Presenters: Dr. Kathleen J. Ferraro, Director of Training & Curriculum, Family Violence Institute, Northern Arizona University; Dr. Neil Websdale, Director, Family Violence Institute, Northern Arizona University; hosted by Ms. Iva Rody, MA,  Program Director, Family Violence Institute, Northern Arizona University
Click here to register